Interesting observation David. Possibly to meet a set price point.
]]>I was being constructive, but I am biased, especially when it comes to arrogance and disregard for the customer. And that has become more a standard industry practice than I care to recall. And that has been destructive to my passion for watches. If that’s not a “constructive” enough sensibility, then I’ll just end it at that.
]]>We are completely open about being biased. Many other sites sell collaboration watches and pretend to be unbiased. Nobody is unbiased. Including you. Our bias is based on our passion for watches. If that is not good enough for you, and you are not going to be constructive, please go where the reviewers are paid to say good things.
]]>You are absolutely wrong if you think there is some kickback coming back to us to say good things about brands. We are providing honest opinions based as our experience as collectors. I have said many times before, we are biased. Every one is. But our bias is not a result of any financial gain, but from our own view as a collector.
]]>Truly innovative, extremely complex, if this is a true Patek leak I am going to be the first one on the wait list.
]]>Thanks for the update.
]]>Or a Suite Class road trip to tour the distilleries in Scotland! Good thought. I did that once, but flew low cost carrier from London to Glasgow. Drove around several distilleries in Scotland, including Isle of Skye. Interesting trip.
]]>